After years of development, it's finally coming together! "The Biblical Natural History Experience," a combination of extraordinary live and inanimate exhibits relating to Biblical and Talmudic zoology, will be opening in its short-term location this year, b'ezrat Hashem. It has been renamed from "The Biblical Museum of Natural History" to reflect the fact that it also has many live exhibits, and also to project the message that it is much more hands-on and interactive than the classic model of a museum where everything is behind glass. (Though the new name is somewhat cumbersome, and does not have an easy shorthand reference, so we are open to other ideas!) You can download a prospectus at this page.
Until we build our own facility, The Biblical Natural History Experience will be housed in a rented building being constructed at the entrance to Moshav Zanoach, which is on the outskirts of Beit Shemesh. Part of the collection is currently being housed next door to where the building is being constructed, and a private preview presentation can be arranged; the price is $180 for a one-hour presentation for a group of up to twelve people. Please write to me if you would like to make a reservation.
Getting this project off the ground is immensely complicated. If you'd like to help in any way, that would be gratefully appreciated! Donation information is at this page. There are other ways in which people can help, too - donating items (flatscreen tvs, furniture, taxidermied animals, small furry edible rodents, etc.), website design, shipping items from the US, publicity, etc. - let me know your ideas!
Looking forward to seeing you at The Biblical Natural History Experience!
Exploring the legacy of the rationalist Rishonim (medieval Torah scholars), and various other notes, by Rabbi Dr. Natan Slifkin, director of The Biblical Museum of Natural History in Beit Shemesh. The views expressed here are those of the author, not the institution.
Monday, September 8, 2014
11 comments:
Comments for this blog are moderated. Please see this post about the comments policy for details. ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED - please use either your real name or a pseudonym.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Have you not been receiving my latest posts?
This is for those who receive my posts via email and have not seen posts in the last few days. The reason is because I moved over to a new s...
-
Who would engage in actions that could lead to the deaths of their own children, and the deaths of many other people in their very own commu...
-
Some shockingly incriminating historical pieces of evidence have come to light regarding the cause of the Meron tragedy. (And to those who s...
-
My, this is interesting. Rav Chaim Kanievsky ztz"l was proclaimed for many years to be the authoritative voice of Daas Torah . Countle...
Mazel tov! Is there going to be an official Grand Opening ceremony?
ReplyDeletePresumably, but I don't yet know when the Grand Opening will be!
DeleteHatzlacha rabba!
ReplyDelete'Machon Teva v'Torah'
ReplyDeleteWhy is there no update on the school in Beit Shemesh so I can gloat that the Israeli court did not see the situation quite the way you and your kind did? Oh well, I guess I just gloated so never mind.
ReplyDeleteYB
I think that you misunderstood the court ruling (and my blog post). The court did indeed see it pretty much the same way as me. They just didn't have the jurisdiction to act.
DeleteDo you think that "gloating" is ever an appropriate sentiment?
You may be right about the court case, I only know that the משרד החינוך and שי פירון lost.
DeleteGloating in the case of the downfall of Reshaim is very appropriate.
דאמר רבי יהודה בריה דרבי שמעון בן פזי מאה ושלש פרשיות אמר דוד, ולא אמר הללויה עד שראה במפלתן של רשעים, שנאמר יתמו חטאים מן הארץ ורשעים עוד אינם ברכי נפשי את ה' הללויה - ברכות ט ב
ישמח צדיק כי חזה נקם פעמיו ירחץ בדם הרשע - תהלים נח
YB
That was the first court, not the second court.
DeleteThis point should be clarified so even laymen (or kollel avreichim...) can understand it.
DeleteThe petitioners went to a civil court with a proceding usually used to adjudicate land use disputes between two parties. The court ruled that it had no jurisdiction over the matter as it is a matter of administrative law involving decisions by the government, not a real estate dispute between two parties. Frankly the court indicated in more than one way that it felt the claim had merits and/or the actions of the municipality were lacking - but that it simply did not have jurisdiction to act.
That quote from Tehillim, YB, does not excuse "gloating," which is simcha with malice. It is arguably that kind of misplaced "simcha" that we are warned about in Pirkei Avot 4:24, with a quote from Mishlei:
Delete(שמואל הקטן אומר, "בנפול אויבך, אל תשמח . . ." (משלי כד,יז
Sabi. Actually בנפל אויבך אל תשמח applies (for example) in the context of a business competiter who incurs a loss. But for reshaim we find no such statement. To the contrary we are encouraged to exult in their downfall. BTW in regards to the passuk you quoted see megillah 16b. I assume that ישראל in that gemara means ישראל כשר and not reshaim
ReplyDeleteYB