What is an ark? There's the Ark of the Covenant that Indiana Jones tried to raid, the Ark of the Law that is situated in every synagogue - and, of course, Noah's Ark. But what exactly is an ark?
What shape was the Ark? Last year I wrote as follows: "Popular depictions of Noah's Ark present it as being a large boat. Boats have rounded hulls, to reduce drag as they move through the water. But the whole significance of Noah's Ark (in contrast to Gilgamesh and other such stories) is that Noah was not a sailor and the Ark was not a boat. It was not designed to move through the water, merely to float in it. It was an ark, a box, not a ship. In that respect, Darren Aronofsky's horrible 2014 film Noah with Russell Crowe was more accurate, depicting the Ark as a crate-like structure."
I wrote this because the word teivah, which also appears in the Talmud in reference to the Ark of the Law (aron hakodesh), refers to a sort of cabinet/ chest/ box, not to any kind of waterborne form of transport. But do you see the mistake that I made?The mistake was to equate the Talmudic usage of the word with the Biblical meaning. Words change their meaning over time. For example, the word olam in Tanach means "forever," and only later was it used to mean "world" or "universe."
In Tanach, the word teivah is not used in reference to the Ark of the Covenant - that is an aron. The word appears in precisely two contexts. One is Noah's Ark, and the other is the basket that Moshe was placed in, to be floated upon the Nile. Both of them are containers that were created to float in water, and were waterproofed with pitch. As such, it seems more than likely that the word teivah refers to a vessel designed to float in the water. This would mean that even if this particular Ark was not designed to travel anywhere, it was still constructed in the same way as every waterborne vessel. (In addition, the fact that the teivah was constructed as a long, narrow structure also implies that it was modeled after a waterborne transport.) Dr. Irving Finkel, an expert in ancient Mesopotamian script, languages, and cultures at the British Museum, has written that the word tubbu appears in a 2500 year old cuneiform tablet in reference to some sort of boat - and possibly linked to the English word "tub," which also refers either to a boat, or to a container!
If the teivah was a form of waterborne vessel, this also further implies that it was not shaped like a box - all right angles - but rather like a boat, which has a rounded hull. However, this cannot be stated with certainty, since some boats still have right angles. Of especial significance is a rare photograph from 1888, of a boatyard in Iraq in which traditional boats are being constructed:
The similarity of the proportions of these boats to Noah's Ark is striking! The photographer, archeologist John Punnett Peters, described it as "A Noachian Boatyard at Hit on the Euphrates." But even though these boats are constructed with squared rather than rounded corners, they are still clearly perceived as boats rather than chests.
It therefore appears that the Biblical Ark, of both Noah and Moses, and in contrast to the Ark of the Covenant, was indeed a sort of boat. Since the function of this Ark was to house something precious rather than as a form of transport, the term later came to be used for any tub/ chest that houses something precious, like an Ark of the Law.
The good news in all this is that when we eventually do get around to building a scale model of Noah's Ark, it will look much more appealing!
If you'd like to find out how to attain fame, meaning and satisfaction by appearing on our Noah's Ark donor board, please write to advancement@BiblicalNaturalHistory.org
2014 Noah film was excellent.
ReplyDeleteProve me wrong
I believe Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch says the "teivah" was a triangular prism.
ReplyDeleteRounded hulls are indeed the most efficient hull form for laminar flow through a viscid incompressible fluid - hence the characteristic shape of a submarine. Floating boats however operate in a turbulent liminal zone between gas and high drag liquid, where the charging cross section presented into the liquid can be crucial as the vessel experiences rolling and pitching moments under various weight distributions. There is no mathematical ideal hullform which will cover all usage cases. Transom hulls, bulbous bows, sponsons, and various other hydrodynamic features all have a role depending on the speed and sea state scenario.
ReplyDeleteIn fairness, Gilgamesh (actually Utanapishtim, the Noach-like character who's describing the flood to Gilgamesh many years later) describes not just a box but a cube.
ReplyDeleteDr. Irving Finkel actually worked with a team to build a replica ark based on realistic dimensions from the original flood myth of Athra-hasis. It was a giant round coracle covered in bitumen. Such boats were used up until the 1950s in Bagdad for transportation. On can see his lecture here: https://youtu.be/s_fkpZSnz2I
ReplyDeleteBut didn't engineers say that Ken Ham's Ark Encounter (which is the Ark made according to Biblical measurements, with a cubit of 51 cm) would only be possible with the engineering know-how that we have today?
ReplyDeletehttps://m.jpost.com/archaeology/has-the-location-of-noahs-ark-finally-been-proven-using-3d-scans-680890
ReplyDeleteSee pg. 101-102 (33-34 in the PDF) in this essay by Rabbi Dr. Izaak Rapaport on the differences between Gilgamesh's ship and the ark: https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/12/jbq_12_2_final.pdf
ReplyDeleteWere the boats in the photo 4,000 years old? Otherwise, I'm unclear why the photo is of any significance, let alone "especial."
ReplyDeleteAre the boats in the photo made to the same proportions as the ark?
ReplyDeleteGood luck with your Shinui ha-Teivah!
ReplyDeleteOops, a typo: "A Noachian Boatyard at Hit on the Euphrates"
ReplyDelete"Olam Chessed Yiboneh" is a verse in Nach and "olam" there means world.
ReplyDeleteSo much for academic scholarship.
Nah, in this case he's right. See the Ibn ezra there, says olam means what it means elsewhere.
DeleteBut see Ibn Ezra Koheles 3:11, where he brings both peshatim. Also see Rashi Nechemia 9:5.