A number of readers misunderstood my explanation of Rav Ettlinger's question regarding esrogim from the other side of the world, and looking back at how I explained it, I see that I did not use the right words. Rav Ettlinger did not view the world in the same way as, say, Rav Moshe Taku, who held that the heavens (and God) are vertically above us and not also on the other side of the earth. Rav Ettlinger was well aware that there is no absolute frame of reference. Indeed, in formulating his question, he himself says that the same question applies the other way around - i.e. that Jews in Australia who import arba minim from Israel might have to turn them upside-down relative to them.
But in my view (and apparently some disagree), this sort of question would not be asked today. It would be inconceivable to us to be concerned about the position of the tree in Australia relative to Israel, and vice-versa. I doubt that even the most fervent Brisker would also make sure to hold arba minim imported from such countries upside-down in order to fulfill his obligation (but then, I am often surprised by people). This question was only asked by Rav Ettlinger because people at that time were still in the process of internalizing the knowledge of the shape of the world. He had to explain why Australians don't fall off the bottom of the world by invoking gravity; today, it is "obvious" that there is nowhere to fall to, and nobody would have to explain it. And my point was this does not reflect any foolishness on his part; even we today have still not entirely internalized the correct view, and we feel uncomfortable with an "upside-down" map of the world.
By the way, I was led to this discussion by reader Yaakov Yehudah who attended (and arranged) a presentation that I gave this week on the subject of exotic shofars. In the lecture, I raised the question of whether the requirement of holding an item derech gedelaso also applies to shofar, which would have very strange results when applied to a shofar from a kudu - one would have to hold it upside-down from the position in which it is normally held. If you would like to attend this presentation, I am giving it online on Sunday via live video feed - you can sign up at http://torahinmotion.org/virtproglib/e-tim/index.htm. The software allows for participants to also IM their questions during the shiur, and even to speak up and be seen if they have a webcam. This is basically the same material from my essay that can be freely downloaded at http://www.zootorah.com/essays/ExoticShofars.pdf, but in the live presentation I will be showing some additional artifacts.
Exploring the legacy of the rationalist Rishonim (medieval Torah scholars), and various other notes, by Rabbi Dr. Natan Slifkin, director of The Biblical Museum of Natural History in Beit Shemesh. The views expressed here are those of the author, not the institution.
Friday, September 23, 2011
5 comments:
Comments for this blog are moderated. Please see this post about the comments policy for details. ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED - please use either your real name or a pseudonym.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Have you not been receiving my latest posts?
This is for those who receive my posts via email and have not seen posts in the last few days. The reason is because I moved over to a new s...
-
Who would engage in actions that could lead to the deaths of their own children, and the deaths of many other people in their very own commu...
-
Some shockingly incriminating historical pieces of evidence have come to light regarding the cause of the Meron tragedy. (And to those who s...
-
My, this is interesting. Rav Chaim Kanievsky ztz"l was proclaimed for many years to be the authoritative voice of Daas Torah . Countle...
Perhaps a modern analogy would be the international dateline. People know what it is, and understand the basic concept. But they don't really 'get it' and ask a lot of questions that appear silly once you actually understand what the dateline is and how it works.
ReplyDeleteThe post is very clear and very intressante. shkoiach.
ReplyDeleteI think part of the reason the upside down map is so confusing is because the Americas are still on the left side. Normally, when you turn a picture upside down, what was on the left side is now on the right. In other words, this map is "upside down" in two ways, not just one.
ReplyDelete(Of course you're right about the general point.)
Is the factor of דרך גדלתו ever applied to objects that aren't of plant origin?
ReplyDeleteTo Steg:
ReplyDeleteIf we to understand derech gedeloso as its normal and natural way rather than in a narrow sense, then yes. For example, when a woman is given up rather than a man because darca bekach.
Also with this understanding of derech gedeloso there is no hava amina to hold a lulav upside down. Why does Torah require derech gedeloso? So that people shouldn't come up with shticky chumros and meshugasen but do things in a normal and natural way.